Atlas Platform
Contract Extractor
tier unknown — we couldn't tellconfidence low — a separate axis from tier; low confidence never auto-decidesAtlas Platform›Cataloguehash · sha256:4f1c…9ab2›Contract Extractorwf-at54c0dread throughLLAtlas Gatewayhttps://llm.atlas.internal
Where this came from
Every figure below is only as trustworthy as the account it was read through
- Application
- Catalogue
- identified by hash · sha256:4f1c…9ab2
- Project
- Atlas Platform
- Atlas Logistics
- Fingerprint
- wf-at54c0d
- inferred from logs
Cost
30-day spend
$246
LOGGEDOn recommended path
$282
ASSUMEDCosts more — a real result. Sometimes the recommendation is don't move.
Share of attributed spend
2%
Current → recommended (diffed against production)
In production today
custom fine-tune
not legible from logs
Recommended
specialist referral
withheld — evidence truncated
Recommendation withheld — truncation corrupted the evidence, so nothing was guessed.
Replay evidence
No measured evidence for this workload.
Replay was not run here, so every quality and cost figure above is modelled or assumed — and labelled as such. This is the common case, not an error.
cannot say — session identifiers do not exist in this log source